Ancient Maya: Civilization and Collapse

First published 2024

Human progress is often lauded as a series of advancements, with each new era surpassing the last. Within this progressive view, there is also a profound respect for the ancient civilizations that laid the groundwork for modern societies. Among these, the Maya civilization commands special attention for its significant growth under challenging environmental and logistical circumstances. This essay aims to examine the complex social structure and the remarkable accomplishments of the Maya, one of the most illustrious pre-Columbian civilizations known to history. It will explore their sophisticated architectural feats and technological advancements, which stand as enduring legacies of their ingenuity and resourcefulness. Moreover, the adaptability of the Maya, enabling them to flourish within the constraints of their surroundings, will be examined, underscoring the dynamic interaction between their culture and the natural world. Additionally, this exploration will extend to the various hypotheses that seek to demystify the decline of this once-magnificent civilization. By weaving together historical data, archaeological findings, and scholarly interpretations, this essay aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Maya, their triumphs, their struggles, and the enigmatic end to their societal dominance.

Historians concur that various ancient civilizations displayed significant cultural maturation and sophistication. Among these, the civilization of the Mayan people stands out prominently. The Maya, a civilization that thrived in Mesoamerica, primarily inhabited what is now the southern part of Mexico. Their classical period spanned from around 300 BCE to 1100 CE, a historical juncture that, in Europe, was marked by the dissolution of the Roman Empire and the ascent of the Holy Roman Empire. The flourishing of Mayan culture can be attributed to their agricultural innovations as well as a complex political structure that facilitated effective governance.

The social and political landscape of the Mayan civilization was distinctly hierarchical, with a monarch at the apex, supported by a class of nobles and priests, while commoners and slaves formed the lower echelons. Monarchical succession was generally hereditary, with the king selecting his successor from among his sons. The kings exerted absolute authority, making unilateral decisions with the aid of the nobility, typically without engaging the general populace in the decision-making process. Despite the autocratic nature of their governance, the Mayans achieved a form of stability and strength, in part through military conquests. They constructed an impressive and widespread civilization, comprising a network of city-states that demonstrated their advanced administrative and organisational capabilities.

Religious observance was a cornerstone of Mayan culture, with priests occupying a venerated status within society. The Mayan priesthood, drawn from the societal elite, was a powerful body and the highest-ranking priest often coincided with the ruler of the Maya. This conflation of spiritual and temporal power underscores the central role of religion in governing public life. Public ceremonies conducted by the priests were elaborate affairs, designed to invoke wonder and maintain subservience among the populace. These rituals frequently incorporated music, dance, feasting, and the presentation of offerings, all integral to the religious fabric of Mayan society. The grandeur of the Maya’s religious devotion is still evident in the remains of their temples, which continue to impress with their architectural prowess.

However, amidst the cultural wealth, a more sombre practice prevailed: human sacrifice. Presided over by the esteemed priesthood, these sacrifices were grim ceremonies embedded in the religious consciousness of the Maya. According to scholars Sharer and Traxler, the act of human sacrifice was not only a spiritual gesture but also a form of divination. It was believed that through such offerings, the gods would communicate with the priests, revealing insights into the future. Moreover, it was a commonly held belief that these sacrifices were a form of sustenance for the deities, ensuring their continued goodwill towards the Mayan people. Often, the individuals chosen for sacrifice were war captives, underscoring the intersection of warfare and spirituality in Mayan culture.

The Mayan civilization bequeathed to posterity one of its most significant and intellectual artifacts: their calendar system. The Maya distinguished themselves as the precursors in the Americas to chronicle historical events with meticulous detail. A central achievement of the Mayan culture was the development of their calendar, which was rooted in the careful observation of celestial bodies. This celestial choreography of the sun, moon, and visible planets served as the scaffold for their calendrical system, effectively dictating the rhythm of seasonal and agricultural cycles crucial for survival. The movements of these celestial bodies were so pivotal that they defined the temporal structure of Mayan life, with the priestly class of astronomer-priests declaring the commencement of each new temporal phase. The sophistication of their astronomical calculations is notable; their writings preserve an astonishingly precise calculation of the Earth’s solar orbit as 365.24 days. Moreover, they chronicled planetary movements, some of which would only be recognised in later ages.

Within the scope of Mayan calendrics, three distinct systems were used, each serving its unique purpose and varying in its level of complexity. The Long Count calendar, in particular, commands attention for its duration and precision, charting a cycle that spans approximately 5,000 years. Scholars like Ettington highlight the calendar’s function as an extensive catalogue of astronomical phenomena and seasonal events, including solstices and equinoxes, reflective of an advanced understanding of the cosmos. Propositions surrounding the Mayan Long Count calendar suggest that it commenced in 3114 BCE and was projected to culminate in 2012 CE. This endpoint, often sensationalised in popular discourse, coincides with an astronomical alignment—the sun’s position relative to the centre of the Milky Way galaxy—an event imbued with both scientific interest and cultural speculation.

The adaptability of the Mayan civilization to their environment stands as one of their most remarkable achievements, particularly their successful agricultural practices in the lowland regions. This accomplishment gains further prominence when contrasted with contemporary agricultural challenges in the same areas. Sharer and Traxler point out that where modern cultivation methods have exhausted the lowland landscapes within a few years, the Maya sustained food production for millions over more than a thousand years. Population growth compelled the Maya to intensify land cultivation to meet increasing food demands, leading to a decrease in soil fertility over time. To combat this decline, the Mayans employed techniques such as slash-and-burn agriculture—clearing forests and using fire to enrich the soil with nutrients from the ash. This practice ensured the continued productivity of the land. Sequentially, the Maya balanced this method with periods of reforestation, mitigating the potential long-term damage from deforestation.

The Maya also faced significant agricultural challenges due to the periodic flooding of the wetlands they inhabited, which posed threats to both their settlements and their farming efforts. To overcome these challenges, they ingeniously constructed raised fields—elevated plots that safeguarded crops from floodwaters while simultaneously capitalising on the fertile wetland soils. This innovative agricultural system allowed the Maya not only to endure but also to thrive in an environment that was inherently difficult for farming, thereby ensuring ample food supply for their populous civilization.

The emergence and refinement of written communication is often viewed as a defining characteristic of an advanced civilization. The Mayan civilization, in particular, was notable for its sophisticated writing system, a composite of phonetic symbols and ideograms. This form of writing is celebrated by many historians as a paramount intellectual accomplishment of the Mayans, according to Sharer and Morley. This writing system enabled the Maya to maintain enduring records, facilitating the preservation and transfer of accumulated wisdom across generations. Among their most extensive records were those concerning agricultural cycles and astronomical observations, meticulously compiled over extended durations. Regrettably, the vast majority of Mayan texts were destroyed during the decline of their society and the subsequent Spanish conquest, resulting in the loss of an invaluable repository of historical and cultural knowledge.

The architectural prowess of the Maya civilization remains a subject of fascination, as evidenced by the surviving remnants of their stone structures and monuments. In the zenith of their cultural development during the Classic period, the Maya transformed the lowland forests into a landscape punctuated by residential clusters, villages, and ceremonial centers. The scale of these sites varied dramatically. Smaller ceremonial complexes typically consisted of a modest number of masonry structures and shrines, whereas the major centers featured grand temples and palaces stacked upon one another. These prominent epicentres served as the hub of administrative and economic activity within the Maya kingdoms, bustling with the exchange of goods and the bustle of communal gatherings and ceremonial events. Notably, the Maya temples were exceptionally grand, reaching toward the sky and adorned with intricately carved stone depictions of deities and hallowed emblems. The construction of such majestic edifices demanded a high degree of skill and craftsmanship, provided by artisans who were adept at stone carving and creating fine plaster from limestone, among other specialised crafts.

In the study of these ancient sites, archaeologists have uncovered evidence that the central areas were interconnected by pathways lined with stone and coated with plaster, suggesting these routes were designed for ceremonial processions that traversed between the temple and palace complexes, as detailed by Demarest. Such discoveries offer a glimpse into the sophisticated urban planning and the ceremonial life that characterised the peak of Mayan civilization.

The precipitous decline of the Mayan civilization has been the subject of much scholarly debate, with no consensus on a definitive cause. Penna suggests that significant climatic transitions from moist to arid conditions, persisting for over a century, played a critical role in the downfall of this primarily agrarian society. For generations, the Mayan people had successfully harnessed both technology and societal structures to cope with the severe environmental challenges of their region. Yet, escalating demands for sustenance led to a departure from traditional agricultural practices, which included fallow periods that allowed the land to recover. The resulting widescale deforestation not only altered regional climate patterns but also initiated soil erosion and a severe reduction in soil fertility. Environmental degradation accelerated as the Mayans’ quest for resources became unsustainable. Vanden and Prevost contend that soil depletion, due to relentless cultivation, was the principal driver behind the rapid disintegration of the Mayan civilization around the year 900. This perspective underscores the fragility of the balance between human activity and environmental constraints, a balance the Mayans ultimately could not maintain.

The achievements of the Mayan civilization were monumental, forged through a sophisticated governmental structure, deep-rooted religious convictions, and remarkable agricultural ingenuity. Their ability to thrive in conditions that would typically be considered inhospitable is a striking aspect of their history, underscoring their resilience and adaptability through the use of advanced technological solutions.

This examination has illuminated the longevity of the Mayan civilization, a period marked by the construction of grand architectural wonders and the establishment of bustling urban centres. Their success in overcoming the limitations imposed by their environment speaks volumes about their capabilities and resourcefulness. Nevertheless, this same vigour for expansion and advancement ultimately catalysed their downfall. The unsustainable exploitation of natural resources led to detrimental environmental changes, toppling the once stable equilibrium they had maintained with nature and triggering their decline.

The story of the Maya serves as a cautionary tale, a clear indication of the consequences that arise when the equilibrium with our ecosystem is disrupted. It is an enduring lesson that the sustainability of human societies is inextricably linked to our respect for and balance with the natural world—a lesson that holds ever-increasing relevance in the contemporary dialogue on ecological preservation and sustainability.

Links

Anderson, Nina. Worse Than Global Warming: Wave Technology, The Imminent Threat to Civilization As Told by the Prophecies. USA: Safe Goods, 2007.

Demarest, Arthur. Ancient Maya: the rise and fall of a rainforest civilization. Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Ettington, Martin. Prophecy: A History and How to Guide. USA: Martin Ettington, 2008.

Haughton, Brian. Hidden History: Lost Civilizations, Secret Knowledge, and Ancient Mysteries. Career Press, 2006.

Marston, Sallie Knox, Paul and Liverman, Diana. World Regions in a Global Context: People, Places, and Environments. 3rd Edition. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2008.

Sharer, Robert and Morley, Griswold. The Ancient Maya. Stanford University Press, 1994.

Vanden, Harry and Prevost, Gary. Politics of Latin America: The Power Game. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

The Impact of Agriculture on Biodiversity

First published 2023

Agriculture is the world’s second largest emitter of greenhouse gasses and is responsible for 13% of total global emissions. It is one of the biggest contributors to biodiversity loss and is due to increased demand for food from an exponentially expanding population. By converting natural habitats and ecosystems into intensely managed farmland to create monocultures of crops, the index of species diversity is mostly reduced. Businesses amplify this negative impact through energy use, transport and waste which further reduces global biodiversity and heavily contributes to greenhouse gas emissions.

By filling in ponds and draining marshlands, more farmland space is created to grow crops. By eradicating wetlands in this way, inland aquatic ecosystems severely decline, leading to major habitat loss for fish, reptiles and amphibians. Habitats provide food and shelter for organisms meaning this loss increases competition among species with similar ecological niches; therefore not all of them survive so species diversity decreases. Farmers can reduce this impact by leaving wet corners of fields rather than draining them and maintaining existing ponds. In 2013, a study of 94 ponds across farmlands in Spain was carried out which concluded that natural ponds within farms increase species richness and diversity compared to artificial ponds but still more so than no ponds.

Additionally, the increasing use of inorganic chemical fertilisers and pesticides indirectly causes a decrease in the species diversity within farmlands. Whilst the use of fertilisers aims to improve the supply of nutrients and promote plant growth, fertiliser runoff can trigger a process called eutrophication. This starts when the nutrient rich fertilisers (containing nitrates and phosphates) are washed into rivers or lakes. These nutrients are taken in by phytoplankton (algae) which grow and reproduce quickly, forming a thick bloom layer on the water’s surface. This prevents sunlight reaching photosynthesising plants underwater which therefore die. The algae will die when it runs out of nutrients from the water. Then bacteria decompose the dead algae, releasing nutrients back into the water. As the bacteria divide and grow, they consume oxygen causing the water to become anoxic. This causes organisms such as fish to die, which disrupts the aquatic food chain, causing lower biodiversity levels. However interestingly, trees can act as natural water filters. As their roots absorb rainwater to minimize the amount of runoff entering rivers and lakes, minimising the effect of eutrophication.

Although they increase the yield of crops, the use of pesticides and herbicides kill insects and weeds respectively which may threaten the survival of the farmers’ plants. To manage this, farmers could use biological control such as the release of parasitic wasps to control aphids (a plant pest which removes nutrients from the plant) or the farmer could use organic rather than inorganic fertilizers.

Furthermore, a lack of crop rotation causes less nutrients in the soil, an increase in soil erosion, and an increase in plant diseases and pests. Crop rotation is the systematic planting of different crops in a particular order over several years in the same growing space. By rotating crops, different nutrients favoured by different plants are absorbed from the soil, preventing any severe lack of one type of nutrient in a certain area of soil. To prevent the negative effects, farmers could use crop rotation that includes a nitrogen-fixing crop, rather than fertilisers, which would improve soil fertility. This would therefore increase the variety of nutrient species and microorganisms underground, leading to an overall increase in biodiversity.

Alternatively, a positive impact of increased agriculture on biodiversity is that soil biodiversity can be increased by intensive farming, Soils form complex ecosystems that make farming possible because there are millions of both microorganisms (such as bacteria and fungi) and macroorganisms (such as worms, mites, ants and spiders) that live in soil. Nutrients provided by fertilisers and growing plants feed organisms. When they eat and dig underground burrowing organisms, like earthworms and termites mix the upper layers, redistribute nutrients and increase the amount of water absorbed by the soil and therefore by the plant. This demonstrates interdependence between plants and organisms within agriculture. Furthermore, some macroorganisms are critical to local farming techniques. For example, Farmers in Burkina Faso and in other areas of West Africa encourage termites to live and burrow in their farm plots because they improve the soil.

To conclude, the trade-off between sustaining a large population agriculturally and maintaining global biodiversity remains a critical challenge. However farmers collectively can reduce the impact of agriculture on biodiversity through less intensive farming techniques and conservation of naturally occurring species.

Links

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258331948_Diversity_in_Mediterranean_farm_ponds_Trade-offs_and_synergies_between_irrigation_modernisation_and_biodiversity_conservation

https://www.wri.org/insights/everything-you-need-know-about-agricultural-emissions

https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/eutrophication-causes-consequences-and-controls-in-aquatic-102364466/